Hello Sculpture Vultures and thank you for joining me today. I am afraid it is going to be a very brief introduction from me today because I am right up to the wire with this episode as I have been super busy. But I can’t say that it has been all work and no play because I have been skiing down slopes in the Alps with my family.

But, I have also had an. Awful lot to do before we left and I have hit the ground running as we’ve come home because we have a really bumper March and April on the docket for Antique Bronze. I’m glad to say that means we’re doing something right, but it does mean that I don’t seem to have five minutes that my own these days.

So today I have a fantastic chat with a very accomplished sculptor called John Belardo. Now, John got in touch with me a few months ago about The Piccarilli Brothers and he asked me if I knew anything about them, and I had to confess to my ignorance because actually I hadn’t really clocked that The Piccarilli brothers were the group of Italian family sculptors who were behind some of the most significant public monuments in the US during the early parts of the 20th century.

Very ignorant of me, but I must say, because I have my kind of, I’m gonna call them bronze blinkers on most of the time, I tend to not look to my right and left. When he flagged them up, I sort looked at the sculptures and thought, oh yes, I have, I’ve seen those sculptures before, but I didn’t really know much of the background.

So John sent me a little bit, few links and things, and I ended up falling down the rabbit hole and I’m never gonna be the same again now. So I have to thank him for that. Now, John has very kindly agreed to come on the show today, not to talk about his own works, which he certainly could because he’s incredibly accomplished.

But to talk about The Piccarillis, and I really love chatting to him because he really knows his stuff. He’s a fascinating character. And also just. He was great fun, so I hope you enjoy the episode as much as I did.

I began our conversation today rather differently by asking him if he’d tell us a little bit about himself?

Capitol Pediment Washington

Apotheosis of Democracy Pediment, featuring peace protecting genius. The Capitol, Washington  Photo by Andreas Praefcke, CC BY 3.0 httpscreativecommons.orglicensesby3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Introducing John Belardo: Sculptor and Storyteller

John: Well, I’m a sculptor in New York City. I teach in various places. My studio practice is in the Hudson Valley, upstate New York, which is just north of New York City. I generally work in terracotta as a medium, and I tend to work in a narrative form, multiple figures grouped together intending to tell a story. My work… well, I’ve been out of school for 30 years, so I suppose that puts me at mid-career.

Lucy: Seasoned, I think they call it.

John: Seasoned is a wonderful word for it. I’m a Fellow of the National Sculpture Society, and as I mentioned, I teach at various places in New York—New York Academy, Art Students League of New York, and Lehman College, City University of New York.

Lucy: And what drew you to this interest that you have in the Piccirilli brothers?

John: Many years ago, I got a very temporary and technical job at Lehman College, CUNY, which is in the Bronx. and I got a phone call. Now—this is 25 years ago—I got a phone call from a faculty member who was giving a talk about the Piccirilli brothers. They had heard about me as a young sculptor, they knew I was of Italian descent, and there were a lot of connections there.

They sent me a nice message, saying— Would you like to come to the talk? It was at the library, I knew nothing about the Piccirilli brothers, so I went and I heard their talk. It turned out to be two faculty members, Bill and Mary Carol, who had done some research. Bill had actually grown up in the Bronx, right around where the Piccirilli brothers had their studio, and the connections to me just kind of burst into existence.

I saw that my family had come to New York just a little after the Piccirilli family. I was a sculptor, I was working in the Bronx, they had set up their studio there for 50, 60 years. And here I was, just coming to this, and suddenly there was this immense amount of information that was laid out in front of me. And from there, I just, I just kind of grabbed a hold of it and eventually, their research transferred over to me, and I started to take it on and lately, there’s been a bit of a rebirth of interest in them. Like I said—this was 25 years ago.

But now, there’s been more interest from different sources. There’s actually going to be a documentary coming out soon by Eduardo Montes-Bradley, and, you know, I’ve done a lot of public lectures on it. I’ve brought it to the National Sculpture Society, I did a presentation at Chesterwood a few years ago. And then, I’ve gone to cultural institutions and given other talks, and it just seems like there’s a tremendous amount of interest in the subject.

Lucy: Tell the audience, those who may not know, who exactly were the Piccirilli brothers? Why are we talking about them today?

The Unsung Legacy of the Piccirilli Brothers

John: So, the Piccirillis came to the United States through New York City, like so many Italian families at the turn of the 20th century. They arrived in New York in 1888, through Battery Park. There were six brothers and their parents. The parents were Giuseppe and Barbara, both from Massa-Carrara. Now, you might recognise that name, because that’s where the marble has come from for everyone from Michelangelo onwards.

So, Giuseppe and his six sons, Giuseppe was a highly trained sculptor and marble carver, a pointer, and he trained all of his sons. He was also trained at the Accademia di San Luca in Rome and he sent two of his sons there as well. Atilio—who a lot of this story revolves around—and Furio.

Both were very accomplished sculptors, and when they arrived in New York, they came like any other immigrant family. with no money and just dreams. But, they also came with a tremendous amount of skill and that skill was stone carving. And they arrived in New York at a really important time, an era known as the City Beautiful Movement.

That was a movement that aimed to showcase the United States as a world power through architecture and sculpture. It was about civic pride and it was about reconnecting with the long European tradition of sculpture and monument-making. And so a lot of the work that was being produced at the time reflected that vision.

These classical civic ideals, these ideas of civic virtue. At the time, most sculptors, after they had modelled their work in clay and cast it in plaster, had to ship their work to Italy to have it carved, and then ship it back.

How a Bronx Studio Became the Epicentre of American Sculpture

But once the Piccirillis were in New York, they set up a studio. They actually started out in a stable on 34th Street, in Manhattan, they just hung up a sign that said Piccirilli Studio and very quickly, they developed a reputation. That reputation was fostered mainly by Daniel Chester French who was, at that time, the most important sculptor in America.

Turn of the 20th century, he was the name and once French figured out who they were, word spread fast. Very soon, they became the go-to studio for all sculptors in the United States who needed their work carved into marble. Not just because they were highly skilled, but because they had a sculptor’s sense about them. They understood how to design a sculpture, how to compose it. They understood surfaces.

But more than that, this was the old Michelangelo thing. They grew up breathing in the artistry, they had absorbed it from their surroundings, it was in their blood. So when they came to America, they brought with them what the City Beautiful Movement was all about, that deep history, that connection to Western classical sculpture, from the Greeks to the Renaissance, right into modernism.

Lucy: I don’t think without them, actually, America would have quite the legacy that it has of marble sculpture. It’s funny, isn’t it? Sometimes, you just need the right people, in the right place, at the right time. Their workshop captured my imagination completely. It obviously became a sculptor’s hub, they were attracting sculptors there, but also, it just seemed like it had the most fantastic atmosphere.

They would feed everyone, they would debate with all the artists who came through, I mean, that just sounds like my kind of place, basically.

Attilio Piccirilli – Courage, Peace & Fortitude,

USS Maine National Monument NYC

John: I agree with you, that’s one of the things that really attracted me to their story. So, their first studio was in Manhattan, but then, their mother became ill, and they decided they had to move to the country. At the time, the Bronx was still farmland. So they moved up to 142nd Street, they built a brownstone and they built a beautiful studio. It quickly became the largest studio in the country, and really—the centre of American sculpture. And what’s amazing is, it wasn’t even something official. people just started coming there and staying.

If you were a sculptor coming from across the country, the Piccirillis actually had rooms where people could stay. So sculptors like Bartlett, McMonies. George Grey Barnard, even Augustus Saint-Gaudens would stay in the studio itself. And of course—it was a great Italian household. so there were these huge dinners. Atilio himself would always be cooking.

There’s actually a wonderful cartoon from the time. you know, back then, magazine articles often had illustrated cartoons alongside them, and it shows Atilio. cooking the spaghetti while all these politicians were stopping by to see the work.

Because they were. politicians were coming in to take a look at the sculptures being produced. And there were these big meals, I mean, I don’t know what I would give to just be invited, just to sit at the kids’ table, even for a little while.

Lucy: One of the things that makes my heart sink about the era we live in is that everything has to be pre-booked, everything has to be organised way ahead of time…

And the thing that appeals to me about this Piccirilli studio is, it feels like things just happened naturally. Like there were these rolling waves of people dropping in and staying for a bit, maybe drinking, maybe talking. Just a constant flow of sculptors, ideas, and discussion. I mean, that’s what Sculpture Vulture is all about—talking about sculpture.

There’s just not enough of it. I feel like, why has the world become so regimented? We’ve lost something in that.

John: I agree with you completely. Sometimes, that’s what a good meal is about, isn’t it? It’s about loosening up, it’s about talking freely, just going with it. And if you’re surrounded by all this great work, you’re in the studio, you’re looking at masterpieces in progress, you’re seeing all these great artists and all this different work around you, it must have been incredible, and then you sit down to a meal with them. This is what the history is about, it’s about that immersion. Where does their sculptural intuition come from? Well, it comes from this life, this experience, sitting at a table with great artists and just soaking up their wisdom.

Behind the Scenes: Carving, Collaboration, and Artistic Humility

Lucy: I mean, do you think that because they were sculptors themselves, the artists who came to them, who needed their pieces translated into marble, do you think that their own sculptural sensibilities were infused into those works?

John: Absolutely, right. Now, today, we can run robots to carve marble. and it’s absolutely perfect, it’s exactly what was scanned into the computer, within reason. But when you had to use calipers, to put down points and then interpret between them. It was essential that the person translating the work did so with sensitivity.

So yes, having a sculptor carve your work made a huge difference. It’s very much like a great symphony, a composer writes it, but it takes a musician to bring it to life. And sculpture unlike, say, an expressive painting is always a collaboration. Especially if it’s public, if it’s in the public square, it is rarely the work of just one person.

Even with bronze sculpture, it goes through so many different hands before it reaches its final form, and marble is no different. So the team you have around you, the people playing the instruments, they need to be skilled, they need to be sensitive, they need to be artists in their own right.

Lucy: But there was a real sense of humility with them, wasn’t there? They didn’t sign their works. Is that correct?

John: Right. But that’s more of a tradition. I agree that there’s a certain humility in not signing, they were showing the proper respect to the original artist, the person who had the genesis of the idea. But it was also a long-standing practice. For example, in a bronze foundry, you would typically have a foundry mark.

Lucy: Yes, they would put a foundry stamp on the work.

John: Exactly. So why not put a carver’s mark for the Piccirillis? Well, that’s where it gets interesting. It’s an odd tradition, and it comes from this romantic idea that sculpture is about the hand of the artist. Think of Michelangelo. By the 19th century, there was this mythology that a genius sculptor, working alone, was personally chiselling every detail.

When, in reality, a huge industry had developed, where technicians were doing the pointing and carving. This had been the norm since the Renaissance. But by the 19th century, there was this growing desire to keep that part of the process hidden, to maintain the illusion that the artist’s hand was the last to touch the stone.

Lucy: Yes, because when it comes to selling a sculpture, the collector wants it to be a Carpeaux, or a Rodin, or a Saint-Gaudens, and if they see that it was actually carved by another hand, then perhaps it feels less valuable to them.

John: Exactly, and that’s where this tradition comes from. There was this sensitivity around it an unease about acknowledging the role of the carvers. Which is ironic—because without them, most of these marble masterpieces wouldn’t exist at all.

Lucy: But it’s such a funny thing, isn’t it? The idea of authenticity, this belief that there’s only one creator, it’s completely misunderstood. People stand in front of a Van Gogh and say, “This is the original painting.” But sculpture has a different legacy, sculpture has always been made in multiples, it was never about producing just one single object.

John: Yes, that’s true especially in bronze. With marble, maybe there was more of an emphasis on the one original block, but with bronze, it was always about multiples. There were casts, editions, moulds being taken, sculpture has always been about reproduction.

Lucy: But I think people misunderstand that because they’re used to thinking about paintings. They assume that every artwork should have a single, unique maker. When in reality, even with paintings there was often a studio of assistants working on them. They would paint the backgrounds. fill in the details and the master artist might only do the final touches. So even in painting, this idea of a single creator is often a myth.

But in sculpture, it’s even more collaborative and I think that’s something people don’t always appreciate.

Attilio Piccirilli – Southern Figures of the Firemen’s Memorial.

Manhattan, New York

John: Yeah, that’s absolutely true. And, you know, the idea of the studio again, going back to the Renaissance and the atelier, or the bodega in the early Renaissance, it was always a whole team of people working on a fresco, for example. But like I said, I think it really does come from that romantic idea of Michelangelo, grumpy in his studio, wrestling with the stone, carving away at it with sheer force of will. But the truth is, sculpture exists in a different world.

Rediscovering the Piccirillis in Today’s Public Art Landscape

At the same time, when you think about something like the City Beautiful Movement, sculpture in public spaces, it becomes almost architectural in nature. It transcends an individual artist. These works are meant to be expressions of community. They are created by teams of people not just sculptors, but funders, planners, engineers, people who make space for them and then, ultimately, appreciate them. Public art is meant to be communal.

I think what you’re alluding to is how, in contemporary times, we have this stereotype of the brooding artist, this wild, untamed character locked away in their studio, driven by some tormented inner vision. And sometimes, sure, that can be true. But it’s also not always the case. When we talk about sculpture that represents civic pride, that brings people together, that captures what we hold in common, then it makes sense that it should be a collaborative effort.

If you compare it to a Gothic cathedral, those took generations to build. The stonemasons, the bricklayers, they were all part of something much bigger than themselves. Their work outlived them, their contributions were part of something transcendent, something that extended beyond the physical world.

Lucy: Yes, and I think it’s quite a modern concept, this idea of giving credit to all the hands involved. Because certainly, those stonemasons, those bricklayers most of them have simply vanished from history. Their names were never recorded.

It’s great that we are now starting to acknowledge everyone involved in creating these monumental works. It’s not just the sculptor. It’s not just the architect. In the case of architectural features, for example, there were entire teams of artisans and craftspeople whose contributions were just as crucial.

Even in my own field, conservation, when I started out 30 years ago, we were expected to be anonymous. We weren’t allowed to have uniforms with our company name on them. We weren’t even allowed to have vehicles with branding on them. The idea was that because we were touching sculptures, we had to remain invisible.

I once had a client working on a contemporary piece, who actually asked if we could have our uniforms dyed the exact shade of the sculpture, so that if people looked out of their office windows, they wouldn’t see us working, as if we would just blend into the artwork itself. I mean, honestly! Of course, we said no, that’s insane.

But there is this funny myth around sculpture, that it must be the work of just one hand, when in reality, that has never been the case.

John: Thankfully, I think you’re right that we are turning away from that outdated idea. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, for example, has now correctly labelled all the Piccirilli marbles as being carved in the Piccirilli Studio.

If you go to the American Wing at the Met, the main atrium, one of the most beautiful spaces in the museum, there are about five to seven sculptures that came through the Piccirilli studio. But for a long time, they weren’t labelled as such. They were only attributed to Daniel Chester French, or Augustus Saint-Gaudens, and their connection to the Piccirillis was erased.

That has now changed. One of the most stunning carvings in the atrium is a relief by Saint-Gaudens, but when you consider how incredibly delicate relief carving is, you realise what a monumental responsibility that was. If you get something even half a millimetre off, the entire effect is ruined. But Saint-Gaudens trusted the Piccirillis to translate his work into marble.

It’s important that we say, “Yes, this is by Saint-Gaudens, but it was carved by the Piccirilli brothers.” That distinction matters.

Lucy: Absolutely. Do you have any personal favourites, or is it impossible to choose?

John: Oh, I do. but it’s hard to pick just one!

When I teach at the Art Students League, we’re just a short walk, two blocks, from Atilio Piccirilli’s monument to the USS Maine. It’s one of the major public memorials in New York City. There are eleven figures surrounding a massive pylon, commemorating the sinking of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor, the event that led to the Spanish-American War.

I love taking students there because it’s such an incredible example of allegory in sculpture. We can walk around it and talk about the different poses, the symbolism, the sheer amount of work that went into it. It’s a masterclass in public memorial sculpture.

However, if I had to choose a personal favourite, it would have to be The Outcast, by Atilio Piccirilli, in Woodlawn Cemetery. It’s not easy to find, you have to make your way deep into the cemetery, either on foot or by golf cart. It’s in this quiet little grotto, completely tucked away. And it was created as a grave marker for Nathan Piccirilli, Orazio’s son, who died in World War II.

It’s an incredibly evocative piece. one that radiates pure emotion. Atilio was a master of the figure, and he modelled this sculpture to convey such an overwhelming sense of angst. The sheer pathos in the pose, it’s absolutely heart-wrenching.

It’s also enormous. about one and a half life-size. So as you approach it, it feels monumental, even in its solitude. And when you discover it, it feels like you’ve found something lost to time, something intensely personal. That feeling is special.

Lucy: Yes! That piece really stood out to me, too. When I was looking through the different works by the Piccirilli brothers, The Outcast just leapt off the page.

I didn’t realise it was a memorial for Nathan Piccirilli, but that actually explains so much. The poignancy in that sculpture, it’s just overwhelming. It’s not just a beautiful piece, it’s palpable. The emotion is right there, right on the surface. You don’t need to read a plaque to understand it you just feel it.

Lucy: So, yeah, gosh, that really is a good one, but shame it’s so difficult to find.

Attilio Piccirilli – The Outcast

John: It’s, I think, worth the hike. You know, I could tell you how to get there on public transportation, but, you know, it’s still way up in the Bronx. It’s worth finding.

But there are always things, every once in a while you know, Atilio did the pediment for Wisconsin’s state capitol. I haven’t been there, but, you know, nobody does pediments anymore, which is such a shame. If you look at the history of them, they’re all so intensely thought out, filled with allegorical figures and symbolic meanings. It’s always fun to investigate these things. And, you know, I’m not an art historian. I’m a sculptor.

Lucy: You mean you’re not a qualified art historian, but clearly you are!

John: Yeah, yeah, you know how it is.

Lucy: You know such a lot!

John: Well, after 25 years of just kind of having this on my stovetop, cooking away, you just accumulate a lot of information. And this is something I’ve always thought about, especially as both a sculptor and a teacher in New York City. There’s always this lesson, especially in the Bronx, where we can tie everything to history.

A lot of students today don’t have a sense of history. They don’t always realize they’re part of something bigger. But when I teach, I can tell them, “You’re not the only one. You’re part of a history that stretches back hundreds, even thousands of years.”

We can connect what’s in the Bronx today to an entire lineage of sculptors, artists, craftsmen, people who have shaped the visual and cultural history of this city. And that’s so important. That’s what public sculpture should always do.

Lucy: Absolutely.

Atilio Piccirilli and The Maine Memorial

John: It’s particularly important in New York City. Because right now, we walk past so much without really seeing it.

Take the USS Maine Memorial, for example, it’s on Central Park West. Most people only know it as the place where you pick up the rickshaws to take a ride through the park. Skateboarders know it because they skate the steps there.

But how many people actually know what it is? How many people realize it marks a hugely significant moment in American history, before the modern era, before the world wars, when America was really coming into its own as a global power?

That monument was given to Atilio Piccirilli when he was still a young artist. In 1901, he had only been in this country for about ten years. And yet, this massive, prestigious commission was given to him. His design was celebrated. It was considered a beautiful and powerful work.

By the time it was finally unveiled in 1913, after all the usual political intrigue, it was one of the most important monuments in the country. Presidents were at the unveiling. It was a huge event.

Now, though, people just walk past it. And, to be honest, if anyone is listening from the Parks Department, it needs some restoration. It needs some care. Like all things, it requires maintenance.

But even in its current state, it has so much to teach us. The allegorical figures around it—especially those on the backside of the monument are absolutely stunning. They represent history, justice, and these classical ideals that were so important at the time.

Lucy: Yeah. I mean, we should probably say for those listening that Atilio Piccirilli was a sculptor in his own right. He wasn’t just carving for other people.

I mean, he did plenty of that, but he became his own man. He was recognised for his own work. That’s what you’re talking about here his own creations, not just his translations of other people’s designs.

John: Yes, absolutely. In a conversation like this, we sometimes skip over things, so I’m glad you brought that up.

Atilio Piccirilli was the artistic lead of the studio. He wasn’t just carving other artists’ work, he was designing his own sculptures, modelling in clay, and then carving his own pieces into marble. There are many sculptures across the country that were specifically created by Atilio, rather than just being executed by the Piccirilli Studio.

But of course, the studio also operated as a service for other artists. And the most famous work they ever created, perhaps the most famous sculpture in the United States, is the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C.

That’s something that everybody knows. But what a lot of people don’t know is that it was carved in the Bronx.

The carving was supervised by Getulio Piccirilli, one of the brothers. It was done so perfectly that when the 28 blocks of Georgia marble were shipped to Washington and assembled, it required no correction, no last-minute adjustments. It was flawless.

And that’s significant because the Lincoln Memorial is more than just a sculpture. It has an almost spiritual quality. Lincoln is depicted as a martyr for democracy. He gave his life for the idea of freedom, for the abolition of slavery.

The Georgia marble it was carved from was quarried by the descendants of slaves. It was then carved in the Bronx by immigrants and finally installed in Washington. where it became this sacred site of American history. Even the process of installing the Lincoln Memorial required reverence.

I always think about the construction of the Temple in Jerusalem. The stones for the Temple were carved off-site, so that the holy ground would not be disturbed by noise. In the same way, the Lincoln Memorial was shaped elsewhere, and then assembled in a place of reflection and solemnity.

That’s why, when you visit the memorial today, you see signs asking for silence. You see flowers laid there. People don’t skateboard around it. They don’t blast music. It’s a place where people go to reflect on Lincoln’s sacrifice, but also on the sacrifice of a nation that tore itself apart over the sin of slavery.

From Dante to the Divine: How Belardo’s Work Carries the Torch

Lucy: And once you came across the Piccirillis, did their work influence your own? Or has it always been a separate love for you?

John: My work is definitely related to the Piccirillis and over time, it has become even more so. I’ve learned a lot from studying their work. Atilio, in particular, was more of an allegorist. He worked with allegory, with these grand, classical figures that symbolised abstract concepts.

I, on the other hand, work more with narrative. My sculptures tell stories, rather than symbolising ideas in the way his often did. But one thing that has profoundly influenced me is the question: How does a figure tell a story?

John: How do multiple figures come together to create a central mass or a mass conception? How do these things, how do forms work together psychologically?

The work of Atilio Piccirilli, particularly whether it’s The Outcast or the figures around the USS Maine Memorial or the Fireman’s Memorial, consists of highly sophisticated compositions.

When I bring that into my studio, I’m constantly working with multiple figures telling stories with those figures in terracotta, which is, again, where Atilio and most sculptors would start in clay.

When I do that, I’m thinking about the same ideas. How do these forms refine themselves into an allegory? How do they refine themselves into a story? How does one figure affect the other?

One of Atilio’s greatest works is his Mother and Child. It’s part of the Maine Memorial, but there’s also a version at Woodlawn Cemetery, at the gravesite of his mother. It’s an incredibly poignant piece. The weight of the small child is bearing down on the mother. And look at the way the lines move, how that weight affects the positioning of the mother. How is the head tilted psychologically toward the child?

There’s this gorgeous vignette between the child’s elbow, which lifts upward through his head and into the mother’s gaze. It’s a masterpiece of composition. So when I go into the studio, I’m thinking about those same questions: How does this figure press against another? How do they come together to create a single mass, something different than just individual figures standing alone? How do these figures tell a story?

And again, Atilio was a master of that. He told more allegorical stories, universal concepts, symbolic themes. I tend to focus on specific narratives, but the techniques of composing figures remain the same.

Recently, I did a triptych based on The Divine Comedy. It took me a couple of years to complete. The Divine Comedy is, of course, separated into three books, the Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso.

I created three large panels, each filled with multiple figures, I think there are about 40 figures total across the entire series. And in these compositions, I’m thinking about the same cause-and-effect structure that Atilio mastered. What is this weight doing against that weight? What is this arm pressing against? What is the psychological line through the composition?

© John Belardo – Inferno, Paradiso, Purgatorio

Lucy: It’s like a kind of time-traveling mentorship. You can span eras and still learn huge amounts from their work and hopefully, take it a step further. Is The Divine Comedy your most recent work?

John: The Divine Comedy is what I’ve been working on.

Lucy: Oh, are you?

John: Yeah, I did a big triptych, it took me a couple of years to complete. And The Divine Comedy is divided into three sections, Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. So I created a series of multi-figure sculptures, pulling out some of the underlying themes from Dante’s epic poem.

Lucy: Do those pieces have a home yet?

John: I have an exhibition coming up next month at King’s College in Pennsylvania. It’ll be on display for a little over a month which is standard for a solo show. After that, like so many of my works, it’ll come back to my studio until it finds another exhibition. People have offered to buy my work, but because it’s terracotta, it’s usually one-of-a-kind.

Going back to our earlier conversation about sculpture and editions, I hesitate to sell pieces because I want people to see them. I want them to be shown in multiple places to reach as many eyes as possible. For instance, the Paradiso panel was exhibited at the National Sculpture Society last summer. Another part of the triptych, the Inferno, was shown at the Butler Institute in Ohio.

So these pieces are getting out there, but I like to keep them available for more exhibitions.

Lucy: But don’t you ever run out of space? I mean, at some point, surely, you have to let some of them go!

John: Yeah, of course I do. But, I made a huge mistake, I moved out of the city. I bought a house with a barn and now… I have too much space.

Lucy: Oh no, that was a terrible mistake! Now you’re never going to let anything go!

John: Exactly! My studio is in the barn, and over the years, I’ve accumulated so much work, and, honestly, I love it. Maybe someday I’ll let more pieces go, but for now, they live with me, and I’m not even sure I’m done with some of them. Since it’s fired terracotta, I can keep adding to them building on the compositions, expanding the narrative. So, for now, they’re not finished yet.

Lucy: Well, if they continue to fascinate you, then it’s worth exploring. Some projects, you just know when you’re done, the energy burns itself out. But if that’s not the case, then there’s still something more to uncover.

John: That’s exactly it. So many artists have been inspired by Dante—Michelangelo, Blake, Rodin, Carpeaux, so many. It has always been a touchstone for artists, and I’m no different. Who knows? It may take many more years before I exhaust the content of The Divine Comedy. But for now…I’m not done yet.

Lucy: Yeah.

John: Not yet.

Lucy: Well, John, can you tell people where they can find out more about your work?

John: My website is johnbelardo.com.

It’s not always up to date, but it’s there. It’s always on my to-do list, but somehow, there’s always something else that needs doing first.

On Instagram, I’m @johnbelardo.

And I teach at The Art Students League, so you can often find me there as well.

Lucy: Great. And thank you so much for joining me today, I really appreciate it.

John: Thank you, Lucy. This has been really fabulous.

Lucy: Great.

Please Support The Show